🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – going beyond who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came large groups of votes that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world where yesterday went kind of poorly for him, in which the opponent would have essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But Mamdani gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year backed the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured it could exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has just over 50% but there’s still around 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened before Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. But no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election we reported on whether Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be more of that – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I think that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.