🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, typical households pays $27,000 annually for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to political disagreements regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. The way our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker earning moderate income pays about five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you compare it to what average US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses that are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When including these expenses compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and employer contribution. Similar to many federal defense, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with major insurers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of current options. And there would certainly be less liability for companies as we no longer have access to our employees' health histories for weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a superior and less expensive strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on major studies. Maybe one bright spot amid current situation could be that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.